đźšš The (new) future of grocery delivery

Published on December 14, 2022

What a ride these past few months have been for grocery delivery startups. Let’s rewind a bit and see where this may go in 2023 and beyond.

Quick-commerce or the story of the elusive business model

If things move fast in FoodTech, nothing came close to the speed at which quick-commerce startups went to the moon and are now crashing. These companies deliver groceries in 10 to 30 minutes from “dark” stores (small warehouses) located in dense urban centers). They were almost a blip on our FoodTech radar in early 2020, raised billions in 2021 and now buying one another to try to survive:

So, is it the end of quick-commerce? Contrary to many doomsayers, we don’t think it will end that soon. They bring convenience to a market which was severely lacking it. Concentration is actually a good thing as it will enable individual stores to become profitable (going beyond the 500 orders a day) and create retention by limiting the number of coupons on the market. And, as for cloud kitchens (think about companies such as Taster or Not So Dark evolved in the past year), a franchise model can become a cashless and powerful wheel of growth.

In a word, that’s a lot of learning and progress for such a young ecosystem. The question of the money thrown at these startups that some consider being a waste. I think that learnings have a cost, notably when they are shared so widely and publicly. This cost is often proportional to the market’s speed and size. For a market that’s bigger than $2,100 billion in Europe, spending a mere 3 to 4 billion to learn how to take on it maybe even be a bargain.

New retailers on the rise

If the media (and Linkedin observers) preferred talking about quick-commerce, another group of startups delivering groceries raised almost as much after the pandemic. We call this category the “new retailers”. They reinvent the way grocery retail is done online, often by rebuilding the whole infrastructure (warehouses, stocks, relationships with suppliers) from the ground up. But, contrary to “old” retailers, they don’t consider their online store as another store but as their only focus. In a word, they bring greater reliability and an offering more suited to the need of online shoppers in their diversity. We can distinguish:

  • the heavyweights such as the Dutch Picnic (over $1B in sales in 2021), Rohlik or the Norwegian Oda, which just raised $151M (even if at a lowered valuation). Their offering is very much the same as incumbent retailers. They “just” attempt to do a better job by focusing only on online consumers.
  • the innovators which are trying to bring something disruptive to food groceries with many different angles, such as:
    • subscriptions: for instance, you can look at LaFourche which focuses on non-perishable ingredients.
    •  reusable packaging with startups such as The Modern Milkman in the UK (which raised ÂŁ50M this month to fund its growth)
    •  ugly fruits&vegetables, or damaged products.
    •  ethic marketplaces which focus on some segments of the population (such as Waysia in France or Yobaba in Germany)

Innovation around groceries was very limited and had a hard time scaling. Now, in three years, we are seeing new companies mushrooming everywhere and, more importantly, growing to a size where they become relevant.

What about the future of groceries?

When wondering about all these innovations, I have to say that I have somewhat mixed feelings. On the one hand, I am glad these companies were created and are developing. Indeed, they bring value to untapped markets showing that traditional retailers were not serving all consumers as they should. And, I can resist the idea that some among these will displace some dinosaur companies that are still too often closing the doors of the market for innovative brands (because as much as we like to talk about D2C, retailers, online or offline, have the keys of the mass market).

However, in a world where we live more and more of our lives online, the supermarket, physical or online, was still a place where we all went and had the same experience. Now, as we shop following our lifestyles or our demographics, groceries can become a new divisive subject.

 

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.