Wellness Trends, Rising Brands & Alternative Proteins

Published on April 2, 2025

Today, I’d like to share a couple of graphs and a mapping that underline the importance of the FoodTech ecosystem, both in its current position and its potential for the future.

1 – Food is medicine – Americans largely agree

The New Consumer published a very good special report on Food & Wellness. Based on a survey of American consumers, we learn that US consumers across all generations agree with the idea that food is medicine.

That’s a theme dear to us, as we spend quite some time talking in this newsletter and in our work about the growing importance of food as medicine and, more specifically, about healthy ageing.

Most americans agree that food is medicine

Beyond, we also learn how the US consumer intends to act on this belief:

2 – A new wave of “insurgent brands”

Bain released its yearly mapping of what it calls insurgent brands, with a large share of them being food & beverage products. These brands are defined by their size ($25M + in revenues) and their growth (x10 the category average)

In the current inflationary context, it is striking to see that many new brands finding their niche.

Insurgent brands

It is also possible to connect this mapping with the above report on health and wellness. First, most of these insurgent brands have a health claim attached to them. Second, beyond their health benefit claim, they have, for the most part, a focus on “indulgence” and pleasure. To succeed, being healthy is far from enough; that can only be a baseline; you first need to have a brand whose products are tasty and “beautiful” and “different” enough to be shared online. A perfect example of the above would be Goodles, a brand of pasta (notably mac & cheese), made “good” by being enriched in proteins and fibres while having a low GI.

3 – New projections on the potential size of the alternative protein market

McKinsey released a note on the size of the global protein market, focusing on alternative proteins. It is expected to grow to about $300 billion by 2050. While this is big, it is far less than previous predictions, which saw alternatives dominate the overall protein market.

McKinsey alternative protein predictions

Also, the report estimates the cost of reaching cost parity with traditional proteins. It would require over $250B in investment by 2050, mainly to scale fermentation capacity and improve bioreactor efficiency.

On the same note, Morgan Stanley released a podcast on the same topic. For them, fermented proteins (notably from biomass and precision fermentation) could reach $30 billion by 2030. It sees two phases:

1 – from 2025 to 2027 with a focus on whey protein and animal nutrition.

2 – a second phase from 2028 to 2030 with competitive alternatives to egg, meat and dairy products.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.