[New report] 🇪🇺💰 State of FoodTech in Europe in 2024

Published on April 3, 2024

I am glad to share our annual report on the European FoodTech ecosystem with you. This report has been made possible with the support of Nestlé.

You can download the full report here.

You can also register for our upcoming webinar (24th of April, 11:30 am CET) to discuss the report’s findings and the future of FoodTech investments globally and in Europe. In the meantime, let’s review some of the report’s main takeaways.

Key learning #1: Investments in European FoodTech startups are declining, but much less than in the rest of the world

European FoodTech startups raised €4.3B in 2023, a 35% decrease from 2022 and 56% from 2021, when investments peaked. However, investments remain much higher than they were in 2020.

If investments are declining in Europe, they are much less affected than in other regions. Global investments decreased by almost 56% between 2022 and 2023. As a consequence, Europe’s FoodTech weight increased. Now, Europe accounts for 32% of worldwide FoodTech investments, up from only 14% in 2020.

Key learning #2: the number of deals increased

While there is less money, we observed an increase in the number of deals, notably in early-stage. Investors are still very active in Europe and are betting on startups with an edge to surf long-term trends. In turn, the decrease in funding is due to a drastic reduction in large deals.

Key learning #3: investments increased upstream

It’s the seventh edition of DigitalFoodLab’s European FoodTech ecosystem report. Seven years is also often considered the usual lifespan of a successful startup from inception to exit. Quite accordingly, even in this complicated context, we observe the signs that the ecosystem is maturing. After a decade of being delivery-focused, the European FoodTech ecosystem is turning a page.

Indeed, delivery investments are declining (more than 90% since 2021). Excluding delivery, FoodTech investments in Europe were not far from being stable.

Investments in AgTech and in Food Science even increased:

  • AgTech: while investments in indoor and urban farms almost vanished, we saw large deals in bioinputs (to reduce the amount of nitrogen put in the soil), carbon credit marketplaces, and farm management platforms.
  • Food Science: alternatives proteins startups did well in Europe in 2023 contrary to what we may think (at least in terms of funding), as did CPG brands (food and beverage direct-to-consumer startups)

I would like to stress the importance of that point for the future role of FoodTech in Europe: in the rest of the world, investments declined severely in both categories. We identify at least three reasons to this good performance of the European FoodTech ecosystem:

  1. the role of public funding (with the combination of regional incentive, national grants, and EU-backed programs): they have accounted for a very significant part of the funding since 2022.
  2. the new role of international investors which are significantly venturing into European FoodTech startups since 2021 (directly or through new Europe-based funds).
  3. the appetite of European food companies (with many of the world’s largest being headquartered on the continent) which have shifted their focus to invest in innovation closer to their HQ and research centers.

Key learning #4: build your own report

While you can learn a lot on this report on the trends shaping the future of food, I am quite sure that many of you could benefit from bespoke insights. That’s why we build specific reports for clients and partners. Here are three examples:

And now what’s next?

2024 will be a challenging year for FoodTech, in Europe and globally. Indeed, our first early insights about investments in the first quarter are showing a slight decline. However, we expect a bounce back early next year.

In the meantime, this represents an opportunity for leading food companies to partner, invest and acquire startups.

Learn more and download the 73-page long report for much more insight, notably on the different categories, national ecosystems, top deals and M&A activity.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.