How crises drive food innovation

Published on February 18, 2025

First, I’d like to thank all the attendees of our webinar last week. I hope you enjoyed it as much as we did. Here is the link to watch and share the video for all the 200+ attendees and those who couldn’t attend. Also, if you’d like access to the slides, please email me.

Today, I’d like to share a couple of graphs that illustrate some of the trends discussed in our trends report and webinar.

1 – Environmental events have impacts on the price of products and act as stimulants for the innovation ecosystem

Egg prices have again soared in the US, reaching $5 for a dozen eggs, twice the price of last year and above the previous record.

This is directly related to flu concerns, with many flocks still being killed. In a word, prices are high and will remain so for quite some time. As we said earlier this year in our “predictions for 2025”, we expect that more and more environmental events such as climate shocks or animal pandemics will cause prices to rise here and there.

As observed over the past couple of years for coffee and cacao (and as detailed in this insight) this can create a wave of innovation.

That’s precisely what we are observing with egg alternatives. Entrepreneurs have not waited for price rises, but they are now surfing it with new funding deals, partnership announcements and product launches. As for cacao, we observe companies going in multiple directions, such as:

  • Plant-based alternatives for B2C applications (Just Egg, Veggs)
  • Plant-based for B2B applications (Yumgo)
  • Precision fermentation startups focused on specific functionalities (Every)

2 – A carbon tax on meat could have very noticeable impacts

A recently published study by the University of Oxford looked at the effects of different versions of a meat tax. More specifically, it studies 3 scenarios around VAT:

  • increasing VAT on meat and dairy products to the maximum in each European country
  • cancelling any VAT on fruits & vegetables
  • combining the above

 

Interestingly, and unlike previous studies, this study went beyond environmental impacts and also looked at health consequences (averted deaths), cost for consumers and for the state. At a European level (UK included), combining both a rise in VAT on meat & dairy (which is in many countries quite lower than the national maximum) and a decrease for fruits & vegetables could achieve significant results with a 6% decrease in environmental impacts, 100,000 or more death avoided each year, and $80B in increased revenue for governments while being almost neutral for consumers.

Few environmental policies could achieve such results while being cost-effective from both the consumer and government point of view. Even if, in the current political context, it seems to be a very complex idea, it shouldn’t be discarded.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.