Beef is back: why meat prices are soaring (and what it means for plant-based)

Published on October 28, 2025

I’d like to share three interesting and contrarian graphs about the health and state of meat and plant-based sales, which are moving in quite unexpected directions.

1 – Meat prices are surging

First, let’s have a look at the impressive surge in beef prices in the US. This is due to a combination of factors:

  • Less livestock in the US due to increasing production costs
  • Environmental factors in other markets (droughts, parasites…)
  • Rising demand

The last factor may be the most surprising: we often hear about a decline in meat consumption. However, over the past decades, while meat production has decreased in most developed economies, overall demand has not declined. Instead, people have shifted their preferences from one type of animal protein (beef) to others, such as eggs, fish, and poultry.

However, the mass adoption of weight-loss GLP-1 drugs combined with the rising appetite of consumers for “anything with protein inside” is creating an increasing demand for beef itself. Consumers who are eating less are indeed spending more on some categories, including meat.

This price surge has multiple consequences, such as steakhouses in both the US and the UK shrinking portions and increasing prices. More broadly, it leads to three questions:

  1. In the current context of increased “food nationalism” and tariff barriers, can we expect anything other than this trend to continue and even to expand to other markets?
  2. If consumers are returning to meat, especially beef, this could prompt governments to increase production subsidies. Then, could it be another dent in an already compromised climate strategy? If we look at our latest insight into what we should eat versus what we actually eat, meat shouldn’t be a big part of the equation.
  3. Will this trend reduce the price gap with plant-based meat and other alternatives, hence creating more appetite for those products?

2 – Consumers’ first reaction is not really to switch to plant-based

When asked, consumers’ first reaction is to buy less beef or to switch to another type of animal protein. However, 37% of them (in the US) would still consider purchasing plant-based products.

At first glance, this graph could look like bad news for plant-based alternatives: it seems consumers are not really keen on them. But I really think this validates the strategy of most players to go for “analogue” products that mimic the taste and texture of meat products. Then, the jump from meat to plant-based is much easier than going from meat to something radically different (such as tofu). Maybe this time, consumers will also experiment with better products than those available during the latest “plant-based opportunity phase” between 2020 and 2022. Nowadays, supermarket shelves are free of the worst products, which have left many consumers with a bad impression.

3 – Is Beyond Meat benefiting from this situation?

Beyond Meat remains the only major plant-based meat startup to have gone public. What could have been an opportunity to be the beacon of the ecosystem is now probably a burden, as it has to be the only player to release quarterly updates on its revenues.

 

It is doing really badly. As shown in the graph above, since its stock market debut, it has had only two profitable quarters. The past five years have been a succession of losses, combined with a declining revenue.

The stock price has similarly suffered, losing more than 90% of its value. It even went into “penny stock” territory (less than $1 a stock, a somewhat shameful state for a company) early this month.

However, as shown in the graph below, the company’s stock has risen by 900%. But that’s not due to any good reason or to any impact on its revenue from the price of meat. The company has become a “meme stock”, a company whose share price skyrockets due to viral attention from individual investors on social media.

Beyond this already fading hype, the company will get better and benefit from the demand for protein-rich products.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.