🔮 FoodTech predictions for 2023

Here is what DigitalFoodLab expects to see in 2023:

First, how good were we on last year’s predictions?

You can read here our 2022 set of predictions and bets. I’d say we were pretty good in a very challenging context where the ecosystem was affected by external forces.

  • Grocery delivery players indeed knew a strong wave of concentration. Players in that space are now chasing after profitability.
  • Plant-based is indeed down, and fermentation is the new “alternative protein star”. However, cellular agriculture is not down. Things are doing much better than I thought they would.
  • We were right in predicting that investments in the infrastructure behind the future of food would be growing, notably in new ingredients, textures, and bioreactors. Again, due to the current situation and the rise in energy costs, we had not seen the problems that indoor farming startups are now facing (in Europe, other regions are not as affected by rising energy costs).
  • Reusable packaging is doing well, but not that well. It rose due to some new regulations, notably in Europe.
  • And we got it wrong when predicting that the ‘party would continue”. Inflation has killed it.

🏭  🥩 The great sorting through the industrialisation of alternative protein

Things are moving fast with plant-based, fermentation, and cellular agriculture. In 2022, we learned that we were still far from having products that tasted, looked and were priced as conventional animal protein ones. For 2023, we think that things will look blurry as many things will happen at the same time:

  • Some will say, “this is over”, as the dispute around plant-based products will continue (as the one we commented on here). Brands will disappear, and products will be removed from the shelves simply because they don’t sell. This will affect young startups short in cash and large companies that just went there for the hype, and eventually, it may reach the big, globally-known startups.
  • Cellular agriculture products will become available in some restaurants, in the US mainly. In the meantime, many startups will (finally) complete their pilot production facilities. So, we will finally know how attractive this technology is from a consumer, environmental and financial point of view. We expect the announcements of investments in large-scale facilities, probably supported by sovereign funds.
  • The political debate on alternative proteins will get hot. On the one hand, it gets mixed up in the culture wars that affect the West. In reaction, many politicians will keep trying to ban companies from using some “meaty” names on their plant-based products (if not banning the products themselves). On the other hand, as said above, new alternatives will become seen as a tool of food sovereignty in other regions.
  • Beyond all the noise created by alternative proteins, we expect much more “behind the scenes” around ingredients (flavours, fats, sugars, etc.) and the infrastructure (notably bioreactors). More broadly, we expect to see the start of a discussion around the end game for the more technological alternative proteins (precision fermentation, cellular agriculture): are they to be used as main ingredients or as components to upgrade the taste and functionalities of plant-based products?

📈 Things we expect to go up in 2023

  • Carbon craziness: carbon accounting, carbon labelling, carbon credits for farmers and solutions to asses how carbon is stored in the soil. We expect to see a year of divergence, with many solutions being developed and experimented with before a period of rationalisation around some standards.
  • Quick-commerce profitability: after a tough year and through consolidation, the number of speedy grocery delivery startups has shrunk to an almost healthy level. Moving to a franchising-based business model (as virtual restaurant brands), the survivors might reach profitability.
  • New procurement solutions for foodservice businesses and small retail stores: these are sprouting all over the world, and some are already becoming giants in Asia. We expect more interest in this huge, profitable and very much undisrupted space.

📉 Things we expect to down in 2023

  • Investments will keep drying up, notably large deals, at least for the first half of the year. We expect a trail of bankruptcy and failures all over the year. Depending on the broader economic situation, things may be brighter in the second half of 2023.
  • Indoor farms: after a lot of hype and mega deals, fortune has turned its back on this ecosystem. However, all is not bad. We expect that some startups with a real technological edge (in growing valuable ingredients) and competitive costs will survive and eventually thrive.

And you, what are your predictions for 2023? If you want to discuss how the many disruptive FoodTech trends could affect your business, let’s plan a call and contact us here!

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Abonnez vous à notre NL mensuelle en Français

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.