FoodTech in Q1 2025: A New Low and a New Map

Published on May 11, 2025

Global FoodTech investments saw a dramatic decline in Q1 2025, reaching just $2.2B — the lowest quarterly figure recorded in years. This marks a sharp acceleration of the downward trend we observed throughout 2024.

As shown in the chart above, funding has been in continuous decline since its peak in 2021. After stabilisations in 2023 and 2024, we were observing the first signs of a bounce back in funding in North America and Asia. But the first quarter of 2025 shows a different direction, with yet another phase of smaller rounds, fewer deals, and tougher competition for capital.

How to explain this decline?

As explained in last week’s insight – the plateau we are on since the start of 2022 can be explained by a mix of structural reasons (VC funding unsuited to long-term innovation in food, long time to adopt disruptive innovation, etc.) and contextual ones. This more recent decline seems to be 100% contextual and linked to the current economic uncertainties, notably on tariffs and their impact on the overall agrifood industries. If big players have to adapt, the time and money they’ll have to spend on innovation could shrink considerably in the short term (and hence fewer acquisitions, fewer partnerships and projects). Then, until things get clearer, we can expect a further decline.

Where is the money going? Despite the overall slowdown, investment distribution offers important signals when compared to previous years (as you can see in our last report on global funding):

  • North America retains the main share with 50% of all FoodTech funding, confirming the positive sentiment that I just shared above.
  • Europe and Asia each accounted for about 20%, 5 to 10 points below where they stood in the past couple of years, showing that the decline is very noticeable there.

Meanwhile, South America, Oceania, and the Middle East are comparatively performing quite well (the key word being comparatively).

Our key takeaways:

  • Flight to quality: Investors are becoming extremely selective. Only mature startups or projects with clear commercial traction can raise significant rounds.
  • Structural headwinds: High interest rates, lower VC fundraising activity, and a slower exit environment will maintain a cap on the number of deals.
  • America first: North America remains clearly dominant. We will see how Europe’s and Asia’s ecosystems will keep up and if they are resilient enough.
  • Niches thrive: some sub-categories are still doing well, and in some instances, exceptionally well. This is noticeably the case of everything that answers an existing or potential uncertainty, such as alternatives to goods whose supply chain has been disrupted by an environmental shock (cacao, eggs, coffee…).

While challenging, we believe that this environment will ultimately benefit the agrifood innovation ecosystem by making it more resilient. As uncertainties won’t disappear, you have to consider how to turn them into an advantage. Also, anticipating shocks and finding innovative answers should be a top priority for any large agrifood business. If that’s your case, let’s discuss how DigitalFoodLab can help.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.