At a crossroads: what 2025 revealed about the future of food

Published on December 16, 2025

As we are nearing the end of the year, now is a great time to reflect on what happened over the past 12 months, to review what we learned during the year, how the predictions we made at the start of the year fared, and think about the perspectives for 2026 for the agrifood industry.

I think the word that best summarises this year is “crossroads”, as the agrifood industry and the AgriFoodtech innovation ecosystem are both facing many of them. Looking at the year in the rearview gives us some ideas of where we stand, and more importantly, of what lies ahead.

 

1 – The agrifood industry is at a crossroads, and it is not looking good…

As shown in the graph below, based on a recent survey, US consumers are simply trading down across most food-related categories. It’s not that they are eating much less, but rather that they are buying cheaper stuff, notably in the categories where agrifood businesses make the highest margins: snacks, soda, alcohol…

consumer-trends-pointing-in-the-wrong-direction

We are here because of a combination of factors, notably:

  • Agrifood businesses have been much more quickly impacted by the current rising tariffs than other industries (where it was possible to stockpile many things). And, in many instances, consumers are wary of possible price rises, saving more, and cutting on the most immediate thing they can: their food budget.
  • Inflation’s aftereffects are still there, with consumers still feeling negatively about the recently rising prices.
  • Climate shocks and shortages of many products (eggs, cacao, coffee, beef…).
  • GLP-1 drugs’ rising adoption (consumers simply eating fewer calories and redistributing their purchasing power).
  • Backlash against sustainability efforts, notably in the US.

These elements have weighed negatively on F&B and commodity companies for quite some time now. What’s new is that it is also impacting the margins of ingredient companies. And, in the short-term at least, all these factors are here to stay. This is a crossroads moment for the whole industry, which in many ways needs to reinvent itself.

In a word, 2025 has been a transition year. The year was still dominated by a focus on cost reduction and on maintaining market share (through increased marketing efforts). Beyond, the industry is now much more focused on:

  • a push towards healthier products, both to answer consumer demand (as illustrated by the chart above) and to create long-term differentiation.
  • finding alternatives to face shortages.

2 – The innovation ecosystem has also evolved to answer those needs

While we mostly discuss the state of the AgriFoodTech innovation ecosystem, it is increasingly important to contextualise it by examining the industry itself. Indeed, if funding has declined by almost 80% since peaking in 2021, this is in significant part due to the absence of exits.

And that can only change if the innovation ecosystem answers the needs expressed by consumers and businesses. This year, even if the investment landscape remained gloomy, it looks like the two sides have finally connected meaningfully. Startups are more focused on addressing industry challenges. We have observed a surge in commercialisation partnerships that should, hopefully, yield results in 2026.

partnerships-corporatexstartups-foodtech-2025

 

3 – 80% score on our predictions for the year

Another way to look at the year is to assess the set of forecasts we made in January (you can find them here). Reviewing this list of 7 predictions shows we did quite well and reinforces the idea that food is at a tipping point. We predicted that:

 ✔️ The context would remain negative and lead to bankruptcies for alternative proteins, notably plant-based, and for vertical farming.

 ✔️ AgTech as a whole would do great (notably agriculture robots), alongside Food Science applications in materials, cosmetics, and healthy ageing: these have been, with the exception of materials, the categories that performed the best during the year, with now (too) many startups plastering cosmetics on their decks.

❌ High uncertainty on regulation for alternative proteins and an increasing number of controversies: actually, the noise created by the new US administration shook things in the right direction, with many countries moving towards more open regulatory frameworks to position themselves as biotech hubs.

 ✔️ Large agrifood businesses to keep moving more partnerships with mature startups, matching identified needs, and providing much less support for younger ventures. The number of partnerships announced has been impressive… as has been the decline in engagement with the more early-stage part of the ecosystem.

½ New extreme climate events will create new hypes: cacao and coffee have been joined by a few new ingredients on the “target list for alternatives”, notably eggs.

✔️ Health, regenerative agriculture and AI would remain the main themes of the year, with more focus on implementing that “talking”. 2025 was the year of acquisitions and portfolio moves focused on healthy snacking and beverages. Similarly, many companies doubled down on their regenerative agriculture commitments, even amid a sustainability backlash.

So, what should we make out of this? First, this was a very intense year, full of movement and uncertainty… and it will probably stay that way in 2026. Questions about health, sustainability, and demographics will continue to challenge the current growth model of the agrifood industry. For industry leaders and innovators, it has become a necessity to deliver a vision of where they stand at this crossroads and help others understand the future.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.