Europe rises, whey surges, risks grow

Published on June 16, 2026

Today, I’d like to share three graphs that recently caught our attention because they highlight the underlying trends shaping the future of food in the short, medium, and long term.

1 – Europe has slowly become a key AgriFoodTech innovation hub

DigitalFoodLab - european foodtech funding vs. global

As shown in the chart above, during the period of global funding decline observed since 2022, Europe’s relative share in the agrifood innovation ecosystem has become much more important. Pre-excitement (2020-22), Europe’s relative share was much smaller than what it is now. This is compounded by the fact that previous FoodTech funding in Europe was mostly targeted towards delivery startups, while nowadays it goes to ingredients, brands, agriculture…

In a word: Europe has a bigger share of a much smaller pie. That’s good, but not enough to grow the future of agriculture and food to its full potential. As discussed in a recent insight, it is still lacking the funds (public and private) to support industrialisation.

2 – When whey becomes more valuable than the cheese it comes from

DigitalFoodLab-FT-whey-prices

 

For decades, whey was an afterthought of cheesemaking, with a limited use in sports supplements and in agriculture. With the current GLP-1 boom and the protein craze that followed, it has become one of the hottest commodities in food. This is quite visible in the chart: whey protein isolate prices have nearly doubled since 2021.

For many cheesemarkers, whey demand has now exceeded their production capabilities. At the current levels, we observe a complete reversal of the previous situation: cheese has, in some cases, become the byproduct of whey production.

As for the innovation ecosystem, this is also having consequences: after years of startups focusing on casein (the key ingredient in cheesemaking) rather than whey (seen as a cheap, disposable commodity), the narrative is slowly starting to change. If whey prices remain high, whey obtained through precision fermentation could make a “comeback”, even more so now that the technologies have progressed.

3 – Can your (European) city become self-sufficient using urban agriculture?

DigitalFoodLab-european-vegetable-sufficiency

The University of Groningen (Netherlands) recently published an interesting piece, including the map above, that analysed 840 European cities to assess how much urban agriculture could help make them self-sufficient in vegetables.

For major cities, the answer is: not much. Paris, Berlin, Madrid, Warsaw, Bucharest, and Budapest can’t, even in the more optimistic scenario displayed here, reach 40% self-sufficiency. However, that could be expected from dense urban centres (as well as the fact that smaller locations in the Netherlands, Sweden or Spain could produce more than they consume).

What’s interesting is the aggregate: combined, these cities could produce up to 28% of the total vegetable demand of their 190M inhabitants. What’s even more interesting is that it’s based on basic, open-air cultivation (gardens, rooftops…) and it excludes fancy technologies like vertical farming or hydroponics. Combining both approaches could mean reaching much higher levels.

4 – Antimicrobial resistance in livestock could lead to exponential losses in a few decades

DigitalFoodLab-FAO-antimicrobial-resistance

This chart comes from a recently published FAO report that analyses the consequences of the growing antimicrobial resistance in livestock. The red area shows what happens if we do nothing: losses escalate silently, reaching nearly $320 billion by 2040.

The blue area is what happens if we phase out antimicrobial growth promoters, the antibiotics routinely added to animal feed to boost growth. It would have a more immediate, but also more limited impact of about $50 billion, and then plateau.

This is a very interesting view of the cost of inaction and also why the problem persists. The costs of acting are immediate, whereas the impact of inaction is diffuse. This is especially true for Asia and Latin America, which will account for more than 80% of global antimicrobial use by 2040.

For now, regulation is tightening in Europe, but not that much elsewhere. As forward costs build up, securing alternatives will become increasingly relevant.

Do you find these insights useful? You could be interested in DigitalFoodLab’s FoodTech watch offer: we deliver bespoke insights tailored to your needs, helping you to follow what’s important for you in the innovation ecosystem, for your innovation team, R&D, or top management.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.