🌟 4 FoodTech fun facts to know (or not)

Published on December 21, 2022

Again, we are at this time to summarize and assess the year. However, this time, I’ll leave it at next year (even if I am quite pleased when I look at the predictions DigitalFoodLab made in January). Indeed, we invite you to a webinar on the 10th of January (10am CET) to reflect on 2022 and, most importantly, to look at the trends to watch in 2023.

In family gatherings during the holiday season, I am often met with sceptical eyes when I say that my daily job is to advise large companies on how to plan and act now to be ready for the future of food (and that they, amazingly, pay for it). If you are like me, I gathered a few fun facts about FoodTech, which could be used as conversation starters or as ways to look smart. For the others, these will be, I hope, insightful, if not fun.

1 – The most subscribed Youtuber, Mr Beast, launched its own chain of restaurants this year and is now planning to raise $150M at a $1.5B valuation.
If you have some time to spare, have a look at the videos of MrBeast (like this one around eating 24k-carat coated foods). Using its huge fanbase, he launched his own burger chain, first virtually and now with physical joints in the US. These are incredibly successful. Now, it is even planning to raise $150M.
This shows the huge potential of celebrity brands in food. If you want to dive deeper, here is the (as always) fascinating New Consumer report with many insights on the subject. We notably learn that, not surprisingly, it works best for younger generations and higher incomes, and the best food products would be restaurants, packaged foods, beverages and supplements.
The big question you can ask yourself and your loved ones is: which celebrities could make you buy food they would brand with their names?

2 – Plant-based foods don’t taste good, and consumers are not ready to buy them
Here is something you can certainly agree with the meat-lover members of your family while explaining the consequences of animal products on the environment.

A few weeks ago, we organised a blind test of 20+ plant-based alternative products and compared them with the “real stuff”. We had 5 “chicken” 🍗 products, 5 🥩 “burgers”, 4 🌭”sausages”, and 3 🥓 “lardons”. I often try alternatives, but not in a way that enables comparison.
On all the products we experienced (excluding sausages), the “real” meat product was without any doubt distinguishable both in taste and visually. Many products were clearly tasting awfully bad (or, to be more objective, they had a very different taste than the meaty product).
However, all is not bad. First, some products were approaching meat products in nutrition, taste and appearance. It was notably the case with Planted and Heura products. Secondly, as this market is driven by the offer and not (yet) consumer demand, having more products on the shelves is always beneficial.

 

3 – Plant-based foods should be cheap
A recent study conducted by MyVegan (the vegan brand of MyProtein) found that 19% of British people were eating more plant-based foods to… reduce their bills. Indeed, even above taste, the first element that drives the acquisition of a food product is price. Current sales data show that to sell a plant-based alternative instead of a meaty product, its price should be less than 90% of the “real stuff” price.
People don’t tend to be honest when you ask them the reasons behind their acquisition of a food product. Still, it is always fun to make a quick family survey and to compare it to actual data (a simple proof could be the amazing growth of discount grocery stores).

 

4 – People spend more on their food out of home

 

This is a decades-old trend which has not been reversed by covid. While many startups are raising billions to deliver groceries, the future may be in restaurants. Consumers (at least in the US, according to this graph) spend more and more of their dollars on out-of-home meals and less at home.

Today, even if food inflation is high (and higher on groceries than on restaurant meals), it should not have a huge impact.

This tends to confirm a trend where we put less value on the food products themselves and more on the experience associated with them. That’s something that should make food brands think a bit more about their future.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.