Why are FoodTech startups moving away from food?

Published on September 2, 2025

Recently, we dedicated a newsletter to how Gen Z treats appearances as a key component of wellness and why it opens opportunities for the food industry. You might think I’m getting obsessed with serums after too much time in Korea and Japan. Maybe. But it also seems the broader FoodTech ecosystem has been taking notes from K-Beauty.

Among the recent wave of startup bankruptcies, especially in the alternative protein space, what’s striking is how many “survivors” now announce moves into cosmetics, therapeutics, or materials.

A move that follows a long trend towards “functionalisation”

This is not entirely new. We’ve long had “dual-use” startups: one core tech, multiple applications. It is quite typical in situations where there is limited funding, and investors require solid business plans. So, founders pitch adjacent markets as potential additional revenue streams. Since funding fell in 2022, we’ve seen companies like Ecovative, which uses mycelium from biomass fermentation for leather and meat alternatives (an approach the startup still maintains today and which helped it raise $28M in late 2024). However, this is more the exception than the rule: at the end of the day, most startups focus on a single application (like Modern Meadow, which targeted both the meat and leather market, and then abandoned the former quite rapidly).

More recently, many alternative protein startups have switched from being “bulk protein” providers (trying to substitute animal proteins with a similar alternative being produced differently) to marketing their products as “functional ingredients”. These are designed to add something more than what animal protein has. This semantic pivot is a response to the growing concerns about their ability to scale production and achieve price parity with the original product they compete with.

Startups venturing into cosmetics

In the past couple of months, among the few bright spots in the alternative protein space, it was striking to see how many of them are announcing a move into a new category:

Bottom line: the same platforms (cell culture, precision fermentation,…) are being re-deployed to markets with viable paths for:

  • Profitability due to a much more favourable mix between scale requirements (you need only a fraction of what would be required in food applications) and pricing is viable
  • Regulatory clarity: claims can be tested clinically, and approvals are clearer
  • Innovation pull: acclaimed in cosmetics and therapeutics, much less so in food, notably now with the rising concerns around UPF and regulation.

Food startups are right to move into those markets… leaders should follow

These moves are far from unprecedented, but they are becoming increasingly frequent. They are driven by all the factors mentioned above and by the current funding environment. From the FoodTech ecosystem’s perspective, this is healthy: de-risking core technologies in adjacent categories accelerates acceptability (both from the consumer and regulatory), helps to build manufacturing capabilities, and proves out claims. Ideally, many of these startups will keep food as a goal, even if it sits on the sidelines for now. When the time is right, they can bring the expertise to our ecosystem.

For large leading companies, this has a double meaning:

1 – Food × Beauty/Wellness is real: as already mentioned here, the link is strengthening. Companies need to engage in that space (and by that, I don’t mean by only putting more protein and collagen in each and every product).

2 – The space for innovation is expanding rather than shrinking: if innovation in cosmetics and materials can come from food, the reverse is also true. This is undoubtedly the case for medium to long-term disruptive technologies.

In a word, if you want to discuss how to enter the food market as a cosmetics/health company or how to explore the “beauty is wellness” trend as a food company, give us a call!

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.