Should you have a kitchen? – #DFInsights

Published on March 25, 2019

Should you transform your kitchen in a closet?

Hi,

In our last newsletter, we talked about our recent report on FoodTech unicorns (you can download it here). As said, 73% of those unicorns are operating delivery services. As time goes by, these startups are getting everywhere and enable a no-cooking-loving person to think it could be possible to get each day a meal delivered to its door. Indeed, at the same time, renting or buying a place to live in the cities these startups operate is getting harder as the prices continue to skyrocket.

Thus, we wondered if it would be economically interesting to just rent or buy places without a kitchen. Here is what we have done. We have looked at 8 expensive and very different cities around the world and for each of them we looked at:

  • the price to rent a small 5 square meter kitchen (including taxes) inside a 30 square meter apartment
  • the price to cook a simple plate with fresh ingredients for a single person
  • the price of being delivered the equivalent plate (including delivery costs) in each city

Should you have your own kitchen?

The map above sum up the conclusions in these 8 cities with 3 groups:

  • cities were it is clearly not profitable to rent a kitchen (and therefore better to order meals each day) such as HK, Singapore and NY
  • cities were space is not an issue (and therefore either rent is not too expensive or delivery costs are high due to distances)
  • indecisive cities where ordering or cooking are both on the table

And if you were considering to buy your apartment (rather than renting it). It would become profitable after a very long time (we supposed you cooked all your meals and never ordered one and never going out) as shown below.

Should you have your own kitchen?

To make things worse, for someone in Paris ordering twice a week and going out once, it would then take 40 years to make the acquisition profitable!

This partly explains the success of delivery startups and the rise of new models delivering you with your week of fresh meals such as SeazonFreshly or Territory.

Tell us what you think about these results! They are much more conclusive than we thought they could be. If there is some interest, we’ll dig deeper.

Have a great week!

Matthieu


Big deals

Keatz, a German-based cloud kitchen business raises an additional $12 million to expand in other European countries. Cloud Kitchens (virtual restaurants) target customers through delivery apps and are on the rise globally.

Starbucks is launching a new VC fund dedicated to food and retail startups. With an initial $100 million to invest, the fund is seeking $300 million from other partners.


Top News

The first gene-edited food is being served. Calixt, a biotech startup in Minneapolis is putting on the market, the first gene-edited food product. Their first product, a soybean oil, altered to produced less trans and saturated fats. It is already used by local restaurants and will be put on the market for customers to buy. Different from GMO products, gene-edited organisms are supposed to reproduce a process that could have happen naturally through breeding. Therefore, wit much less safety controls, products can enter the market fast.

Wired

Is fake meat better for the environment? It is surely a strong argument for plant-based startups such as Impossible Foods or Beyond meat when they claim that their products are better for the environment. In this analysis, we learn that a burger made from a cow has a footprint 89% higher compared to one made from Impossible Foods’ plant-based “meat”.

Fast Company

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.