Money is raining over grocery delivery startups

One of the positive aspects of COVID (from a FoodTech point of view, at least) is how fast e-commerce has grown and become ubiquitous. This is creating a lot of new opportunities. In the past weeks alone, many grocery delivery startups have announced deals. This may become the key foodtech theme of 2021 as investors and entrepreneurs are betting that they can disrupt food retail. I really feel that the amounts invested and the general interest in the subject are reminiscent of the growth of the restaurant delivery ecosystem of five or six years ago. However, grocery business is much bigger and the assailants are coming with a broader array of strategies. Indeed, we have identified seven types of player and business model:

1- 🍽️ ⇒ 🏠 Restaurant delivery startups, such as Deliveroo and Wolt, which are now partnering with retailers to deliver groceries. Glovo recently raised a new round of $100M to grow in that space and open its own dark stores.

2- 🏪 🚴‍♂️ Dark store pure players, such as Gorillas or Weezy, which operate their own facilities and assortments (and hence potential partnerships with CPG brands). These startups’ promise is to deliver convenience orders (such as shampoo, or more believably, a bottle of wine) in less than 15 minutes. In the past month:

⇒ That’s a lot of money! For city dwellers like me, it will be a boon: we’ll have a couple years of subsidized deliveries and almost free food. As the competition intensifies we will see the return of the coupons which made food almost free during the height of the competition between Deliveroo, Uber and others. For their investors, I am not so sure.

3- 🆕 New retailers: startups which raised the biggest amounts of money to build, from scratch, the infrastructure of e-commerce grocers on the national level:

  • Rohilk, a Czech startup, already active in two other countries, Austria and Hungary, raised $230M to expand in new markets.
  • Picnic, the famous Dutch startup, which has raised €350M until now, is already active in Germany’s bordering cities and should reach France soon.

More here on these two startups

4- 🥑🥕 ⇒ 📦 Meal kits (ingredients coupled with recipes): 2020 was the year of the come-back for these ventures as consumers became wary of supermarkets. Gousto became a unicorn and Mindful Chef was acquired by Nestlé. We’ll have to see if this positive trend persists as the pandemic eases and other models grow.

5- 👨🏻‍🌾 ⇒ 🏡 Farm-to-home startups have a very compelling promise for the consumer: you will receive fresh food delivered from farms and producers as close as possible to your home. The underlying idea relies on impeccable logistics in which most items spend less than a day in warehouses. Three startups lead that trend in Europe:

6- 🏪 Instacart-likes. Instacart’s concept (basically Uber for groceries; you do your shopping on Instacart’s app and independent workers will go collect them for you) has inspired many startups globally, such as BuyMie in Europe. On the surface, this model is much leaner than others as it doesn’t require warehouses or means of transportation (nor even actual workers). However, Instacart’s growth seems to require a constant influx of cash. With more than $2B raised, it has just added $265M to its pockets before a planned IPO.

7- 🗑️ Anti-waste retailers

A small but growing ecosystem of startups is fighting against food waste. Some, such as Matsmart (Sweden), market surplus foods. Others, such as L’Intendance (France), sell unpackaged foods in reusable pots. These startups have been attracting more attention with recent deals:

⇒ The grocery market is big enough for all these business models to survive. However, all won’t be able to deliver on the promise they made to their investors. When I look at this market, I have three questions:

1 – Could this solution potentially be affordable to the bulk of consumers? Indeed, the number of consumers for whom convenience and quality are higher priorities than the price of the foods they buy is limited.

2 – Is there any economy of scale? Is adding a new city to your belt reducing the costs?

3 – What is the end game? Is there someone to acquire these startups or are they surfing on a long-term trend big enough to disrupt the market?

This is definitely an ecosystem that we will keep looking at as new deals and launches are made in the coming months and years. Retailers and CPG companies should also start to question how they will answer the challenges created by these new heavily funded ventures. Fortunately for them, they can call DigitalFoodLab if they want to talk about it 😉 (by the way, you can contact me here)

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Abonnez vous à notre NL mensuelle en Français

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.