Are lab-grown meat startups close to bring their products on the market?

Published on November 4, 2019

Clean meat startups (ventures developing meat replicates grown from a few cells of the “real thing”) are driving more and more attention to the question of the future of proteins. The big question one could ask is “when will we see clean meat products on the shelves?”. Indeed, many startups are strangely aligned on a 2021 released date that can seem a bit too optimistic. While most of these startups (here is a leaders’ mapping) are organising bigger and bigger testing events, few facts about their readiness to enter the market are given. However, on the bright side, we have had in a row, two interesting news which could indicate that some startups are getting closer to the market.

First, Aleph Farms gained a lot of comments for its successful attempt at producing meat in the space. This feat, while technically interesting, is not closing the gap between the current cost of this replicate meat. Indeed, clean meat beef is said to cost now around $100 a burger. However, by creating and succeeding in such an experiment, the company has drawn a lot of attention to cell-based startups from their potential future consumers.

106172866 1570643130473futuremeatproductionmodule

Second, Future Meat, another Israeli lab-grown meat start-up raises $14 million to build production plant. While not the biggest deal in this ecosystem, it is still significant and even more by the fact it is said to enable the company to put products on the market. The company want to market blends of plant-based and clean meat proteins by 2021 and then hopes to achieve a $10/pound meat replicate by 2022. Future meat’s approach is rather different from its competitors. It does not look to sell its now brand but to be a technology provider to any company looking to either develop 100% cell-based meat or blend products.

Even if clean meat is highly unsettling, the deadline fixed by these startups for real products is approaching. And combining them with plant-based (or “real” meat) is a good way to make these products acceptable by consumers at a good price.

For more information, you can just take a look at our mapping and investment analysis of the plant-based and clean-meat startup ecosystems here. And if you wonder how this revolution (meat alternatives account for less than $5B today, for UBS it will be $85B by 2030), will impact your business, DigitalFoodLab is here to work on:

1- learn: we help you understand what’s happening and then to stay updated
2- identify and scout the best partner and technology to invest in, inspire or partner with
3- create the best strategy path toward disruptive innovation
4- act with or as a startup

Contact

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.