What is the future of quick-commerce?

Deals in quick-commerce (startups operating dark stores for deliveries generally in less than 15 minutes) are increasingly large as India’s Swiggy raised $1.25B and US-based GoPuff raised $1B.

Dija, which had “only” raised $20M, has one of the best services (at least from my experience as a user). It has been acquired by GoPuff to become its way into the European market. Interestingly the discussion is rumoured to have dragged on the question of the speed of delivery (Dija, as other European services, delivers in less than 10 minutes while GoPuff has a 30 minutes window). Rumours are spreading about Gorillas seeking a deal initially from DoorDash and now from Delivery Hero.

In the meantime, Carrefour announced that it had taken a minority stake in Cajoo last funding ($40M), the leading French quick-commerce startup.

Beyond acquisitions, we identify two “sub-trends” in the quick-commerce ecosystem:

  • a focus on developing economies: if it should work anywhere, it is mostly in cities where a middle class is present and growing, and labour is still cheap. That is notably the case of Delivery Hero and Glovo that recently announced its intention to double its investment in Africa.
  • a divergence between pure players (quick-commerce startups with their own dark stores) and restaurant delivery companies partnering with retailers (such as Deliveroo). As the investments and the attention focuses on the former, the later may face challenges. If India is the place that set the trends, as often in food delivery, we may see some changes. Zomato, one of India’s two key leaders in food delivery, shut down its grocery partnerships (and has invested $100M in a local q-commerce startup). Offering 30 minutes deliveries coming from stores you don’t own (and hence don’t manage the inventory) is much less compelling for the consumer than 10 minutes deliveries where you are sure that all the items will arrive.

source: sacra.com

DigitalFoodLab: Dark stores can be viable if they reach a minimum of daily orders, which is higher in cities with high labour costs. At 10 or 15 players in a town, this threshold can’t be reached.

These first moves toward consolidation in this space are quick (but everything in this business is, isn’t it?). So now the question is, “with two or three players max in any given city or country, is there a viable business model?”. It certainly can if the consolidators gain enough bargaining and marketing power to reach interesting. Time will (quickly) say.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Abonnez vous à notre NL mensuelle en Français

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.