FoodTech recap: subscriptions to get both fresh, personalised food and cocktails delivered

Published on February 19, 2020

Hi,

Subscription plans are often viewed as the Holy Grail by entrepreneurs, especially for online FoodTech delivery services and new brands. With it, you can transform your expensively acquired customer into a recurring client. This week, in this newsletter we cover tow examples of such subscription plan. First with a new and trendy cocktail startup, Haus and then with Thistle, a ready-to-eat delivery startup.

#1 – Haus, the low alcohol cocktail startup raises $4.5m to build a subscription plan

Haus, a low alcohol cocktail maker raises $4.5m to grow faster, notably through a membership program. Haus’ drinks are at 15% ABV (level of alcohol). The infusion of cash will be used to launch a subscription service rather than to focus on retail expansion. This is both a risky and audacious bet from a new beverage brand. We will see if a brand such as Haus can convince younger generations to subscribe to a monthly $144 plan for two bottles. Would you be ready to subscribe to a monthly delivery of booze? I am quite curious to see how well it goes.

More here

Haus_bottle

#2 – Thistle, a ready to eat delivery startup raises $5m to cover all your dietary needs

Thistle, a startup that delivers 3-times a week cooked meals raised $5M. We look keenly on all startups working on solutions covering all your needs with fresh and qualitative foods.

Startups such as Thistle compete with meal kits companies such as HelloFresh or Blue Apron which have a hard time now. Consumers seem ready to take the extra step (and extra spending) to receive already cooked meals at home. And with only 3 delivery per weeks, in morning slots, the company also avoid the high costs of delivery on demand and has also less environmental impact. Is this kind of more personalised subscription plan will work where meal kits seem to be failing (notably at getting good retention)?

More here

#3 – Who will prove the plant-based burgers that all the restaurants want and need?

While most QSR chains are dealing with either Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, what are the options for smaller players? Should they also source products from these two companies and brand them on their menus? To date, alternatives are not quite satisfying and they lack the bargaining power of big names such as Starbucks (which announced its will to add more plant-based foods in its restaurants).

A solution may come from HoReCa retailers. Sonner this year, Sysco, one of the leaders of this business (an equivalent the Transgourmet and Pomona in Europe) launched its plant-based burger. Both a burger patty and plant-based ground beef will be available to Sysco’s many clients in the hospitality industry.

Will these products be trusted as the new startup brands can be?

More here

#4 – Yofix, the Israeli plant-based and probiotic yogurt receive funding from two European dairy giants

Yofix, one of the top startups (at least in terms of media attention) from the famous Israeli accelerator The Kitchen raises $2.5m. The startup is known for its probiotic plant-based and soy-free yogourts. While many plant-based startups are receiving bad comments for their long list of highly processed ingredients, Yofix’s have a quite clean label.

What’s more interesting, at least in the scope of this deal is the name of the investors. Two big milk related companies, the French cheesemaker BEL and the German dairy and yoghurt company Muller have taken part in the deal.

Will it help these European dairy giants to avoid the fate of some of their US counterparts?

More here


You still want more, here are some of our favourite reads of the last couple of weeks:

  • Airplane meals are a subject of intense debate (and of many YouTube videos and Instagram accounts), but what’s behind them? Vox
  • Danone invests an undisclosed amount in French anti-waste startup Phenix. Food Ingredients
  • Oatly a Swedish startup and one of the leading plant-based milk players in the US is considering IPO, sale and additional funding. If it goes to be acquired or to raise money, it will be interesting to see who is behind the deal. FoodDive
  • Famous snack bars maker Kind is now developing into frozen and fresh foods. Look at the video interview if you have some time. TL;DR; Kind didn’t need to raise money because of its sustainable and high growth. The only need it had was to partner with Mars for international distribution. CNBC
  • Egg white replacement Dutch startup raises $500k to develop its product. AgFunder

As you can see, FoodTech is indeed moving faster than ever in 2020. But you are not alone. DigitalFoodLab is here to help you :

  • Stay at the top of your domain. We prove exclusive insights and information through talks and our FoodTech watch
  • Prepare for the future. We help you make plans for long term trends and their implication on your business and to identify the right startup to work on your current issues.
  • Innovate faster. We work with you to define the innovation strategy fitted to your business means and needs.

No matter if you are a startup or a food giant, we are here to work with you and change the world of food! (contact us).

Have a great week!

Matthieu

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.