FoodTech critics?

Published on July 17, 2019

Was it better before?

Hi,

The wonderland of FoodTech startups is getting under some pressure. Entrepreneurs are used to be considered as world saviours battling against the forces of evil (understand the big bad food corporates). Media are often helping his battle, being wowed by startups full of promises. But (it’s a good “but”), some FoodTech startups have now reached a size were they become scrutinised by the same media. Let’s see a few examples:

– Beyond Meat’s plant-based meat alternatives have been generally considered as “good” but as it is now valued $10B, questions arise on the exact list of ingredients

– Impossible Foods is also questioned because of the use of “leghemoglobin” (heme) which is responsible for the “bleeding” effect of its burgers. However, this heme, produced by the way with genetically-modified yeast, is also identified by the World Health Organisation as a potential source of gut cancer. As said here, plant-based startups have to address these concerns.

– the naming battle (can I call a burger, an alternative protein burger) is still on inEurope

– Cooking Robots are even criticised for their lack of humanity and repetitiveness.

We can, however, be surprised by this recent intensity of criticism of these new products and services. It seems a bit too coincidental that this starts just at the same moment, traditional CPG companies discover that they have new, innovative competitors ;).

That being said, it’s still great news when FoodTech startups get attention. It’s a new step toward respectability and acceptance of new food products and services.

Have a great week!

Matthieu


Big Deals

$3.4M for Kencko, a new way to consume more fruits and vegetables. Juices are a good answer to the hardship to get the recommended 5 portions of fruits and vegetables every day. However, they are hard to deliver at your door. Kencko has developed an answer with a subscription plan to receive at your door dry and ready to mix juices, personalised to your needs.

Techcrunch

Innovorder, a French ePOS raise $10M. Hospitality software startups are booming in Europe. Innovorder is one of France’s leaders in this market, helping 600 clients and 17,000 restaurants to restaurant managers to manage bookings, payments and many other issues. This additional cash will be used to grow the company, notably through acquisitions.

Maddyness

Wolt, the Finish delivery startup that you didn’t know about raised $160M.We knew at least four major (let’s say startups which have raised more than $100m) restaurant delivery startups (Deliveroo, Glovo, Delivery Hero, Takeaway). Now, there is a fifth player with Finland’s Wolt. Well developed in the Nordics, the company intends to develop in many more countries.

EU-startups


News

Perfect day ice cream

Perfect Day has released its first commercial product: ice-cream. The startup ($61M raised) is developing cow-free milk (yes milk proteins created through fermentation.

The spoon

23andMe, the genetics company can now predict which ice-cream flavours you will like. With close to 1 million DNA tested, 23andMe is proving how your genome can influence your tastes. And as summer approaches, they are proving it with ice-cream. Their scientists have found hundreds of genetic markers, which combined with age, sex and ancestry make possible to tell if you will prefer vanilla over chocolate taste.

Bustle

A new seed fund dedicated to alternative proteins in Germany. As we said in our report dedicated to Germany’s FoodTech (you can download it for free here), the country is putting in place a strong ecosystem dedicated to what seems to be one of the key ingredients to the future of food: plant-based and clean meat startups.

The Spoon

Cloud kitchens impact could be huge. A detailed article on the potential impact of an expansion of Cloud Kitchens businesses or the entrance of Amazon in the food delivery business. Impact on current restaurants could be huge.

Techcrunch

 

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.