Clean-meat & plant-based: investments and trends

Published on September 12, 2019

Where is this alternative protein market coming from and where is it going?

(This note is a summary of a presentation given in Amsterdam at the Kind.Earth.Tech conference)

Many people are now talking about a future where if not irrelevant, cattle, sheep and poultry use for human consumption would be reduced to a bare minimum. Two approaches confront each other:

  • Plant-based startups such as Beyond MeatImpossible Foods and Just competing to create products with the taste, appearance, culinary properties (and so on) of the real stuff (meat, mayo, etc.) with plants and a (good) dose of chemistry
  • Clean meat or cell-based startups aiming to reproduce the “real” stuff (again beef, poultry, mayo, tuna, etc.) with all its properties using cell multiplication. Two types of clean meat exist, which are quite different:
    • Fermentation processes based mostly on yeast which is the closer to the market with startups such as Perfect Day (milk) and Clara Foods (eggs)
    • Cell-based startups using actual animal cells to let them multiply. This process, itself not so complicated in theory, is still not replicable at an acceptable cost. Startups focus mostly on beef and pork. A good example is Mosa Meat, co-founded by Mark Post, the researcher known to have produced the first burger of cell-based beef.

FoodTech-DigitalFoodLab

Clean-meat (or cell-based) and plant-based startups are part of the larger FoodScience category (see definitions)

The world is not beef – startups are working on many substitutes

As shown below, the alternative protein ecosystem is crowed with many startups trying to replicate a vast range of products.

Mapping DigitalFoodLab

If meat and especially receiving most of the attention now, due to Beyond Meat’s IPO (with its stock rising like a rocket), let’s not forget that the first company that received a lot of coverage is Just and its just mayo products. The areas that receive most attention are:

  • Meat, notably beef and pork. While not an expensive meat, pork, is thought to be a good fit for clean meat due to :
    • Chinese interest to more traceable (and sustainable) products. Provenance and safety are something clean meat could delivery well
    • Asian (and especially Chinese) broader acceptance of the concept of cell-based products, both on a regulatory and consumer level
  • Dairy, mostly with plant-based alternatives. One could say, that many traditional companies operate in this domain with substitutes, such as Oatly. However, these new ventures are reaching for further resemblance to dairy products in terms of taste and proteins.
  • Eggs & mayo products
  • Tuna and more largely fish are considered mostly by clean meat startups to develop alternatives to products that have both high market value and which natural resources are depleted (hence tuna)

 

Investments and deals – rising but still a small share of the global FoodTech

Investments dfl

Global investments in plant-based startups (blue) and in cell-based startups (red) and aggregated number of deals per year

Investments have been multiplied by 4 from very low levels in 2014 ($150m globally invested in alternative proteins) to a more significant $600m in 2018. As shown in the graph above, clean meat investments were almost inexistant before 2016 and have started to be noticeable in the last two years. They still account for a tiny share of the global alternative protein investments.

Clean meat and plant bases v s foodtech

Global investments in FoodTech (blue) and investments in plant-based & cell-based startups (red).

If investments have grown significantly in this specific domain, they are still dwarfed by the global investments in FoodTech. Indeed in 2017, alt proteins investments accounted for only 2% of FoodTech, this share has grown to 4% in 2018.

DigitalFoodLab x Kind Earth 26 08 19 021

Most notable deals in plant-based (bigger than $20m) and cell-based startups (bigger than $1m)

Even if partial, the graph with the most noticeable deals gives us a clear picture of something typical in Food(tech): the slow then fast movement. In the last 5 years, we have seen a slowly increasing number of significant deals and then suddenly in 2018 it looked like that any projects tagged with alternative proteins on its pitch deck were able to raise money.

Trends

We can have two conclusions with the above data:

First, this slow and then growing movement is quite typical in FoodTech. It generally indicates a tipping point. Alternative proteins startups have just entered a new level and are now considered as serious investments (therefore, investors are betting that there is room for some to become multi-billion dollar businesses, just as Beyond Meat). So, we can expect many significant deals in the incoming months and years.

Then, if we follow data blindly, the European FoodTech ecosystem has known its tipping point in 2016, two years after the global (which means the US, at that time) ecosystem. Applying a quick translation would mean that 2020 would be the “hot” year for alternative proteins startups to raise money in Europe.

Startups to consider

One of the best things in FoodTech is that even if understanding the underlying technology of some products can be tricky, testing and liking it is pretty easy. So we have put below, some of the most speaker of startups in plant-based and cell-based world with their website link to let you try some of the available products.

Logo (link to website) Name Alternative to Technology Country
NewImage Kite Hill Milk, Cheese, Yogurt Plant-based USA
NewImage Ripple Milk, Yogurt Plant-based

(pea protein)

USA
NewImage Perfect Day Milk Cell-based

(Fermentation)

USA
NewImage Impossible Foods Beef Plant-based USA
NewImage Beyond Meat Beef

(Chicken, pork sausages)

Plant-based USA
NewImage SuperMeat Poultry Clean Meat Israël
NewImage Higher Steaks Pork Clean Meat UK
NewImage Aleph Farms Beef Cell-based Israël
NewImage Mosa Meat Beef Cell-based Netherlands
NewImage Algama Mayo Plant-based

(Algae)

France
NewImage Clara Foods Eggs Cell-based

(Fermenationà

USA
NewImage Just Eggs-based products Row3 Column 2 Row1 Column 1
NewImage Finless Foods Fish Cell-based USA

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.