🔮 2025 predictions: Buckle up for a year of uncertainty and shocks

Published on January 15, 2025

Let’s have a look at DigitalFoodLab’s seven predictions for 2025.

💬 First, let’s start with two words for this year: uncertainty and shocks. Said more directly: buckle your belts; the road ahead will be bumpy.

  • Uncertainty: until the end of the year, it seemed clear that rates would go down with inflation easing out and a quite resilient economy. Then, the reward for investing in risky assets, notably venture capital, would increase, and hence, we would see more funding for AgriFoodTech startups. But, the US elections and some recent economic data point in another direction where inflation and rates could remain higher for longer. For FoodTech, it means a double uncertainty:
  • Shocks: extreme climate events are occurring more regularly, and a wave of protectionism is creating the conditions for additional shocks on agricultural prices in 2025.

1️⃣ We don’t expect any significant bounce back or venture creation in funding in 2025 with an ecosystem oriented towards quality rather than quantity. While the situation has been relatively homogeneous over the past years in terms of geography, this year could be different:

  • North America: a small to moderate improvement in terms of funding could be felt quite early in the year
  • Europe: we expect that the situation will deteriorate significantly further. While the decrease in funding was smoother than in the rest of the world, due to significant public money acting as a cushion, 2025 could be really complicated with less funding and fewer new “cool” startups being created.
  • Asia-Pacific: we expect an increase in funding, probably still led by delivery startups and the burgeoning ecosystems in AgTech and Food Science all over the continent.

Beyond funding, we expect that after a year of decrease, we’ll observe a stabilisation in the number of early-stage deals.

2️⃣ Relatively high inflation rates will weigh heavily on key FoodTech categories.

  • Plant-based sales improved slightly in 2024, but if inflation remains high, notably in the US, we don’t anticipate a return to high-growth rates before the end of the year.
  • We expect that alternative proteins, more generally (startups using cellular agriculture, precision fermentation, or biomass fermentation to produce bulk proteins), will have another challenging year as they still can’t prove a road towards price parity.
  • Vertical farming, or what remains of this ecosystem, will probably be wiped out by increasing energy costs.

3️⃣ This context will create opportunities for some well-positioned players all along the food value chain:

  • AgTech as a whole should do great, notably agriculture robots.
  • Applications of Food Science beyond food should become a theme, notably in categories such as materials (packaging, textile,…) and cosmetics.
  • B2B applications (notably for alternative proteins) around healthy ingredients should perform well.

4️⃣ We expect high uncertainty around an evolving regulation for alternative proteins and an increasing number of controversies:

5️⃣ We expect large agrifood businesses to keep moving towards a “venture clienting” open innovation model, hence being less involved with early-stage startups. This means more partnerships with mature startups matching identified needs and much less support for younger ventures.

6️⃣ New extreme climate events will create new hypes: as it was the case in 2024 for cacao and coffee, climate events in one corner of the world can make prices skyrocket and create the conditions for the emergence of innovations creating alternatives.

  • First, high prices on new ingredients, or still high prices on cacao and coffee, will sustain innovations in some niches. We expect some products using advanced biotechnologies will be released to the public by the end of the year.
  • Then this will also be beneficial for upstream innovations, both preventive  (carbon credits combined with regenerative agriculture) and adaptive (drought-resilient crops, for example).

7️⃣ 💉🧑‍🌾 🤖 Health, regenerative agriculture and AI will remain the main themes of the year, but we expect that the focus will move from discovery to application. We expect that we’ll go beyond discovery this year and be much more focused on implementing strategies.

In short, as you can see, I am not overly optimistic about the year, but that’s what predictions are about; otherwise, they would be wishlists.

 

As the year starts, I am sure you all know at least one person who would benefit from reading this newsletter to understand better what the future of food will be made of! You can directly subscribe them to the newsletter here.

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.