burger menu
✕
Subscribe
✕
Subscribe

đź’¸ [Exclusive data] – FoodTech investments for the first half of 2023

A month ago, we released the FoodTech Top deals for the first half of the year, both at a Global and a European level. Now, I can share with you the level of investments. I’d love to say that they are bouncing back, but that’s quite far from the reality we observed in the data. However, everything is not dark. Hidden in the data, I have found things that make me reasonably optimistic and indicate that we are not far from bouncing back.

Global FoodTech investments are stabilising… at low levels

Investments in Q2 2023 have again decreased, but “only” by 10%. They reached a shallow level compared to previous years.

In many ways, this data confirms what we saw with the top deals, or sooner this year with our report on FoodTech unicorns: the absence of mega deals (multiple hundred million) has a notable impact on the ecosystem’s overall health. To put it more bluntly: the companies that should be raising these rounds are either shutting down or downsizing and hoping for better days (the example of Perfect Day, a leading alternative protein startup, once rumoured to be planning an IPO, now shutting a part of its activities hastily, is quite striking).

Already bouncing back in Europe?

Interestingly, we have a couple of reasons to be optimistic when we look at the investments in European FoodTech startups:

First, if investments also decreased in Europe, they floored at a comparatively higher level than global investments. This is primarily due to some large deals still happening in Europe. This resilience is provided by public backers (such as France’s BPI) and also by the fact that valuations were already much lower on the old continent than in the US.

If this pattern holds in the year’s second half, European startups could account for 30% of global FoodTech investments, almost twice as much as its usual 10 to 15% “share”.

If we look at where investments are going in terms of categories, again, we see that the upstream and midstream parts of the value chains are relative winners (only relative, as in absolute value, the amount invested there also decreases). Still, this also coincides with a greater appetite for climate and impact-driven investments, which find more value in agriculture and new food products than in delivery.

Deal size is still decreasing

We also observed a steep decrease in the median size of the deals observed. Even from Q1 to Q2, the median deal decreased by 15% in size. This confirms something we have already discussed in this newsletter: deals are still happening, notably in early-stage startups. That’s maybe the best news of all!

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Abonnez vous à notre NL mensuelle en Français

Related posts

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

✕

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).
✕

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.
✕

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.
✕

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.
✕

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.
✕

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.
✕

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.
✕
Get in touch

5 rue Paul Dupuy
75016 Paris, France