🌱🍔=💩 Is plant-based meat “just another fad”?

Published on January 26, 2023

Putting innovations on the market is really hard. You must fight multiple battles simultaneously, from consumer adoption to funding your growth. This often leads entrepreneurs to overpromise and hence to disillusions. I feel that plant-based meat is just at this stage right now (if not the entire alternative protein ecosystem). Let’s take a long view to understand where we are.

Last week, Bloomberg released an article called “fake meat was supposed to save the world. It became just another fad”. It caused a lot of fuss in the FoodTech microcosm, as it is a shameless attack on Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods, the two “historical” leaders. The magazine cover goes as far as comparing them to 💩 (see below). This created a pile of articles in defence of these two companies or of the overall plant-based meat category. Impossible Foods paid for a whole page in the New York Times (see below), saying that it had supporters on Reddit (a weird choice I think).

So, beyond the noise, what should we think about that? The article was globally right when saying that:

  • Most plant-based meat products don’t taste good. Startups are overpricing on taste and texture, often telling consumers that their product taste as good as meat, which is often a blatant lie, which in turn can lead to a level of mistrust on other allegations.
  • The link between plant-based meat and healthiness is fading (due to high processing). As it was the main reason for consumers to buy meat alternatives, it can help to explain the stagnation in sales observed in some markets.

It was a bit catchy and exaggerated by focusing only on a couple of startups (but it was an article, not a report), by generalising the US situation, and most of all by discounting all the other meat alternatives as irrelevant. In a word, consumers want products that taste good (which means as good as meat here) and are at least as affordable. And, on both marks, we are far from it by a long shot.

However, it does not mean that things are over and that plant-based meat was a fad. That’s where long-term disruptive innovation gets a bit more complicated (or interesting). We like to use the hype curve below to see how things move forward. However, it is only a tool, and mistakes are still possible. I think that most people thought that plant-based meat products were actually market ready that It was only a matter of time before they would reach the mass market. But we were collectively wrong. We were just in the excitement phase, with a lot of hype and not that much reality check.

Plant-based meat is “just” going through a normal disillusionment phase. It’s nothing unusual for a new technology/trend. As it was not yet ready for mass adoption and needs multiple improvements (texture, price, taste, capabilities), the hype is fading, and we hear doomsayers telling the tale of its end.

In a word, things are bad for plant-based meat, but that’s ok. Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods are actually entering their adolescent years as the overall ecosystem. Things will be bumpy for the next 2 to 4 years, but much of the future truly looks promising for alternative proteins. Indeed:

  • The reasoning behind alternatives to animal proteins is stronger than ever. Animal farming emits a large and growing amount of greenhouse gases. Additionally, the number of consumers looking for animal products is growing fast globally.
  • Answers to the main challenges facing these alternatives are being developed, from better-tasting products, new textures, and additional capabilities being built to reduce prices.
  • New technologies such as precision fermentation and cellular agriculture are due to create additional offerings (notably by producing and blending them with plants).

If you want to know more about the future of proteins, notably opportunities and challenges, we have worked on an insight report on this subject with MSCI, a leading financial company editing a food revolution index. You can download it (for free) here!

You're in a good company

Join the 60+ clients of Digital FoodLab: leading agrifood companies, retailers, banks, investors, startups, and public organisations.

Use case: project for a global F&B company looking to map its AgTech innovation ecosystem and the best startups to partner with

What we did:

  • Mapping of the AgTech ecosystem: startups, research regulators, and other leading companies.
  • Discussion to select areas to focus on.
  • Analysis of the information to reveal the trends and a model to analyse eventual partners.
  • A workshop to validate the opportunities based on our recommendations.
  • Scouting of relevant partners followed by introductions.

Results:

  • Mapping the different categories of innovations in AgTech that should be considered now to create long-term benefits for the business.
  • Identification of key partners (an incubator and a couple of startups).

Use case: project for a CPG company on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we did:

  • Education of the board through a couple of workshops to define the perimeter
  • Identification of key opportunities and threats created by long-term evolutions (technologies, business models, behavioural changes).
  • Deep dives on each of the priority categories.
  • Co-construction of a vision on how the company should address these challenges.
  • Identification of partners (startups, incubators, funds) to move forward.

Results:

  • Creating a consensus on which categories to prioritise and how to address them.
  • Implementation of an open innovation strategy through the development of partnerships.

Use case: project for a global CPG company to develop a strategy on the healthy ageing ecosystem

What we do (ongoing mission on a subscription model):

  • Kick-off where we present an overview of the AgriFoodTech ecosystem to select with the client the categories to cover and for each, the level of information required.
  • Monthly newsletter: each month we send a newsletter with the articles that we have gathered ranked by relevance, their summaries, and a layer of analysis.
  • Database: we set up a personalised database that will be filled month after month with the information gathered on the companies identified for the watch.
  • Workshops: twice a year with the client’s innovation team and other “innovation curious” team members, we present an overview of the evolutions, key trends and a dashboard of the topics followed by the watch.

Results:

  • A clear, regular and evolutive tool to follow what is happening in terms of innovation on key topics.
  • A forum (through the workshops) to discuss innovation trends and new opportunities.

Use case: opportunity screening for an ingredient company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the ecosystem studied.
  • Mapping of the different trends shaping the innovation ecosystem of the client.
  • Analysis of the trends on DigitalFoodLab’s trend curve and other relevant frameworks.
  • Workshop to discuss DigitalFoodLab’s recommendations on key trends to prioritise

Results:

  • Shared view of the innovation ecosystem for the client with a view of the trends to prioritize.
  • Clear document (personalised trend curve) that can be easily shared internaly to explain the company’s innovation choices and which can be then updated each year.

Use case: scouting for an agriculture coop

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define the perimeter of the client, the goals of the scouting (partnerships) and the criteria on which startups should be evaluated.
  • Set-up scouting: we selected the first batch of 20+ key startups following the criteria of the client.
  • On-going scouting: then we set up a quarterly scouting of about ten startups.
  • For each scouted startup, we created an ID card with key information such as the business and technological maturity, funding, and corporate partnerships. We also added an explanation of why we selected this startup.

Results:

  • An ongoing and evolutive scouting are matching the client's criteria and its capabilities in terms of deal flow.

Use case: working on an acquisition process for a CPG company

What we did:

  • Kick-off to define what the client is seeking, notably in terms of maturity.
  • Workshop with the client based on a mapping of the different innovation ecosystems adjacent to its activities to select some priorities and discuss inspiring examples of startup acquisition stories.
  • Identification of 20+ targets.
  • Workshop to select the most relevant to engage with.
  • DigitalFoodLab worked as a sparing partner during the acquisition process, notably to help design how the acquired startup could be integrated into the overall company’s strategy.

Results:

  • Different results from traditional M&A processes with a focus on the client’s innovation strategy.
  • Identification of a good match for an acquisition.

Use case: market due diligence on sugar alternatives

What we did:

  • Kick-off with the client to discuss its interest on this category, its expectations and existing level of information (notably on the target company).
  • Mapping of the ecosystem to analyse the different existing alternatives and technologies to compare them.
  • Interview (calls) with relevant startups made by our internal biotechnology expert.
  • Recommendation on whether to invest or not.

Results:

  • Clear view of the ecosystem and of the reasons to believe (or not) in each sub-category.
  • Enforceable recommendations based on facts and expertise.